
November 30, 2004
Rapid Evolution of a New Fluorescent Protein
Fascinated by the efficient way the human immune system generates a
rapid response to create a near-infinite variety of antibodies,
researchers have “hijacked” that machinery and used it to
evolve a new type of fluorescent protein.
The mutation process, called somatic hypermutation (SHM), normally
acts on immunoglobulin genes, producing a large array of antibodies
necessary to attack microbes and other foreign substances that the
immune system may never have encountered before.

“What we were trying to do was take, say, one Shakespearean play and see if we could mutate it into a whole different story. It was unknown whether we could do it until we tried.”
Roger Y. Tsien
The researchers said their demonstration that SHM can be widely
adaptable for research use opens the way for enormously faster mutation
of genes to produce proteins with useful new properties, including
research tools and disease therapeutics.
For example, the researchers used SHM to evolve a red fluorescent
protein - which is used to track molecules inside cells - with improved
stability and color emission properties beyond that which the
researchers could create on their own. The properties of the new
fluorescent protein, made by a mutant gene called mPlum, will
make it a useful indicator of gene activity or protein trafficking when
mPlum is attached to a specific gene in a living cell, they
said.
The research team led by Roger Y. Tsien, a Howard Hughes Medical
Institute investigator at the University of California, San Diego,
reported its achievement in the November 30, 2004, issue of the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. In related but
separate studies, Tsien's group has used a different strategy to create
an array of new colors of fluorescent protein. (To read about those
studies, please go to http://www.hhmi.org/news/tsien2.html).
According to Tsien, the process of SHM, which takes place in
antibody-producing B cells of the immune system, offers considerable
advantages for researchers seeking to generate a large variety of
mutant genes to produce proteins with new properties.
“The traditional approach to mutagenesis is to use a
biochemical method to make changes in a gene in the test tube and then
insert the gene into an organism to determine the properties of its
protein,” he said. “You then have to grow it up and pull
the gene out in order to do any further mutation cycles. So, you're
constantly putting the gene in to find out its properties and pulling
it out to make more changes. It's extremely tedious and time-consuming,
and the size of the library of mutant genes is limited by the
efficiency with which we can introduce at most one mutant copy of the
gene per cell. If two different mutant genes end up in the same cell,
the effect of the good mutant would be diluted and masked by the
not-so-good version.”
Another approach to gene alteration, which is just as problematic,
said Tsien, is to treat cells with x-rays or chemicals that generate
mutations. “The problem there is that if you induce too much
mutation, you kill the organisms because you're frying all the genes
they need,” he said.
“What we really wanted was an organism with cells that could
rapidly produce mutations and target them to one specific gene,”
said Tsien. “To our surprise, that organism is us.” SHM
produces mutant genes at roughly a million times the rate of mutation
elsewhere in the genome, said Tsien. And in earlier studies, other
researchers had demonstrated that SHM could be induced in B cells to
repair a single mutation in a non-antibody gene.
“This finding hinted that the process might be useful for
generating multiple mutations,” he said. “But it's like
taking a perfectly typed manuscript, introducing one mistake, and
giving it to a million bad typists to see whether any of them could
accidentally fix it. They could eventually fix it, but what we were
trying to do was take, say, one Shakespearean play and see if we could
mutate it into a whole different story. It was unknown whether we could
do it until we tried,” said Tsien.
To explore whether SHM could create a broad array of mutations, the
researchers introduced a gene for a red fluorescent protein into a
human B cell cancer line, called Ramos, thatRamos, which mutates
immunoglobulin genes through SHM. The gene for the fluorescent protein
was fitted with an “on-switch” that could be activated by
the antibiotic doxycycline, so the researchers could control its
activity in the cells. Since SHM affects only active genes, this
technique allowed the researchers to also control the rate of mutation
of the introduced gene.
The scientists' objective was to induce SHM to evolve new versions
of the red fluorescent protein that would be more useful in the
laboratory. Specifically, they hoped to create a molecule that
fluoresced at longer wavelengths than the original protein when
stimulated by laser light. Such a fluorescent protein would help
researchers use fluorescent proteins in intact mammals, because it
would absorb and emit light at red wavelengths beyond those absorbed by
blood.
Once they had allowed the B cells to carry out SHM on the gene for
red fluorescent protein, the researchers used a cell-sorting technique
based on fluorescence to separate out cells whose randomly mutated
genes produced proteins that fluoresced at longer wavelengths. The
researchers carried out 23 cycles in which they allowed SHM to mutate
the gene. In each cycle they isolated cells that fluoresced at longer
wavelengths. They then allowed those cells to proliferate, and then
mutated the gene again with SHM.
At the end of these cycles, the process had yielded a mutant that
the researchers named mPlum because of its purplish appearance
under reflected light. In addition to its improved fluorescence, the
new protein was also more resistant to bleaching by light than the
original red fluorescent protein.
Particularly striking, said Tsien, was that SHM
“outperformed” human researchers' efforts to design a
protein that fluoresced at longer wavelengths based on their knowledge
of protein structure.
“When people in the lab had used their best chemical
intuition, they didn't get as far as SHM did. And SHM chose a much
different route that arrived at a different structure than we would
have,” said Tsien. “We were unable to think up
mPlum; it's something only SHM could have found. We are not
patient enough to have gone through 23 rounds. And it would have taken
us much more time and effort.”
And, the researchers found that SHM made a broad array of mutations
in its production of new gene sequences - meaning that it can be a
highly “creative” approach to producing improved genes.
Analysis of where the genes for the fluorescent proteins ended up
when inserted into the B-cell genome revealed that initially many were
integrated outside the region, or locus, that contained SHM's primary
targets, immunoglobulin genes. However, the researchers found that the
mPlum mutation was made on a gene that happened to land at an
immunoglobulin locus.
“That makes us think that there is something special about the
immunoglobulin locus that makes it a little better than other sites,
and further efforts will aim at targeting such loci better in
introducing genes,” said Tsien.
Overall, he said, SHM should prove to be extremely useful in
directed protein evolution. “It will not be limited to the
particular class of proteins that we studied,” he said. “It
does require that you have a robust way to pick out the best cells of
every generation without killing them. But if you have such a means,
you should be able to select for practically any protein property you
want. That means that the genes of the immune system — which has
already proven to be smarter than us — can now be applied to produce a
vast array of proteins other than antibodies.”
|